• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 months ago

    Like, how do you even screw this up? Sony…the ones who have access to all the super secret technical documents, full source codes, CAD drawings, prototypes, probably even people still working there who worked on it originally etc. Things that many who work on the open source emulators can only dream of seeing.

    Made a shit emulator.

    • Magiilaro@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Creating a good emulator takes a lot of time and money, and that I think is the true reason why.

      What they have released is a MVP, a minimum viable product, it checks all the boxes for a releaseable thing and that’s what the higher ups, the product leads and other finance stakeholders want to hear.

      Additional features or proper scaling? Yeah, nice we put that on the list for MVP+, for sure! When will that come? Nobody knows and we have no development time to work on it because now with the release the focus was shifted to the next project, but it is on the list and we will come back to it.

      I have heard that so often in so many projects I was part of, as a grunt with no power, and for nearly all of them I still wait for the MVP+ time to ever happen.

      • Titou@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Them, the ones having full control on the platform, failed were foss developpers succeed. They have no excuse.

        • Magiilaro@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          FOSS developers have no cost reporting, no meetings with C level and stakeholders, no shareholders, no release plans, no schedules. What they have is passion.

          They just created what they want to create, they have a deep personal agenda to make something they want to use for themselves and that has to have therefore the polish and quality they want to have it to have.

          The corporate developers wanted to make a good product too I am very sure, but if the higher ups say that it has to be released by a fixed date then there is not much that the developers can do about it.

          So yes, the company has no real excuses, besides money.

          • Titou@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Many situations proved to us that passion make better things, sadly today’s AAA game developpers dosn’t have any passion anymore, mostly because of pression made by boss who are only driven by money.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It looks like their complaints are primarily about how they handle processing the output (scaling and filters). That’s not anything having internal documents helps with.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They even messed up the emulation on their PS Classic, despite being based on a simpler console and having full control of the hardware and software.

    • BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I stopped blaming greed because it holds no one responsible and is like calling a lion a murderer, or a tapeworm a parasite. The product is bad because everyone who works at Sony is incompetent and dumb.

      • Magiilaro@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would not say everyone but everyone in power is incompetent and dumb.

        The normal employee who just hast to do as told can only do as told and if that means that all the good features and functionalities are out of scope then that it is. It has nothing to do with the competence or intelligence of the employee