Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agoRock Eagle Flaglemmy.worldimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up1668arrow-down153file-text
arrow-up1615arrow-down1imageRock Eagle Flaglemmy.worldSweetpeaches69@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square134fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down4·5 months agoWhy doesn’t Canada see a similar per capita rate of shootings despite having more guns per capita than the US?
minus-squareInternetUser2012@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·5 months agoMaybe because their gun laws are a lot more strict? Kind of proves the point that gun regulation works doesn’t it?
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·5 months agoI’m not against regulations. It’s just something that came up in Bowling for Columbine that I’ve found interesting.
minus-squareÐ Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoProbably because most of those Canadians actually have a fucking good reason to be armed, IE for hunting, defending against dangerous wildlife, competitive shooting
minus-squarePrandom_returns@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoPls automatic vs hunting stat per capita.
Why doesn’t Canada see a similar per capita rate of shootings despite having more guns per capita than the US?
Maybe because their gun laws are a lot more strict? Kind of proves the point that gun regulation works doesn’t it?
I’m not against regulations. It’s just something that came up in Bowling for Columbine that I’ve found interesting.
deleted by creator
Probably because most of those Canadians actually have a fucking good reason to be armed, IE for hunting, defending against dangerous wildlife, competitive shooting
Pls automatic vs hunting stat per capita.
Cricket cricket