Regardless of their innocence or guilt, the trial is widely regarded as farcical and unjust, even at the time.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    Very interesting story. Even though the ballistics test proved their guilt decades later the trial was a sham and they should have been acquitted. Amazing how a fascist even came to their defense.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      So much of forensics is cargo-cult “science” that starts with a conclusion and works backwards to prove it. Furthermore, the analysis is frequently subjective and without a control.

      Here is an article on ballistics testing in particular that highlights some criticisms.

    • deegeese
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s hard to get worked up about an unjust conviction of someone who actually was the killer.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        But these were two guys fighting against the robber barons and the rise of capitalism as we know it today. Yeah, a couple other working class people died as a result, but it’s hard to see it as cut and dry as all that. How many people have died of capitalism. The body counts are way, way out of balance.

      • Blackout@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        He got what he deserved but the court case was a fiasco. I’d rather it be an honest justice.