• sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, yes, Turkey, the dependable ally which still hasn’t agreed to Sweden’s accession to NATO!

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          All I’ve seen are words from Turkey. First the words were “we won’t accept Sweden”. Then the words were “we will accept Sweden”. Still Turkey has not officially accepted Sweden and Sweden is not yet a member. Erdogan says a lot. His actions is what I count.

          • mim@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            His country’s economy is in the toilet, the last thing he needs it to antagonise one of their largest (if not the largest) trading partner: the EU.

            Doubt he will continue blocking it, but time will tell.

  • xuxebiko@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why is Russia allowed to hold the world hostage? Who right do they have to starve people in other countries?

    Every nation should kick Russians out, block their accounts, and sanction Russia.

    • GuyFi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They aren’t, but they just can do that. International politics is reallllly anarchistic because how the fuck do you arrest a country. Say if the U.S decided to just stop exporting anything at all- no more food and other stuff- all you could really do is just tell them pwese downt doo that, we need the foweign aiwd :3 This also assumes your the leader of a powerful country, which is a rather difficult position to get to.

      In essence, get fucked international politics go brrrrr

      • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except that isn’t remotely true. For example we can set up trade embargos and cut Russia off from all trade under US sphere of influence so they’ll only be able to trade with Brazil India Iran and China. We can also seize foreign owned assets owned by Russians in western nations. More aggressively we can send US/NATO war ships to Ukraine to provide an armed escort for Ukrainian ships carrying grain in order to ensure that shipments do not delay.

        • reksas
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder if trade embargo would actually even work anymore if enough big corporations just decide to not care about it like some have done with sanctions.

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah and why don’t we put em in re-education camps while were at it! That’ll teach those dirty Russians /s

    • hitwright@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry, kicking subhuman Russians has already became a pass time activity in most post-soviet countries.

      Also Turkey should easily uphold the grain deal, since Russian ships are even afraid to leave the ports

  • rusticus1773@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we haven’t already, all foreign assets of Putin and all Russian leadership and oligarchs need to be seized immediately. Unless the pain is felt by those with power nothing will change.

    There are also a number of Western companies still operating in Russia. That needs to change.

    • ScaraTera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do believe that this was a terrible move by the kremlin, but there are some rules that must be followed even between enemies. If we all do petty thing, whats the difference between us and them.

      • Syringe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think a better argument is that Russia is holding a few more cards here than we do. If we want to get petty, they have explosives planted in a nuclear reactor that they could just blow up.

        If we want to go in and kick their asses, we risk global war.

        There’s a lot of reasons that this is bad, but there are a lot of really smart people working on these problems.

        “What’s the difference between us and them” not only is an emotional appeal, it dehumanizes them, which weirdly makes your argument the same as theirs.

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we all do petty thing, whats the difference between us and them.

        (Not) invading / annexing your neighbor, to name one.

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The answer to the paradox of tolerance is usually “the one fighting for peaceful coexistence is in the right”.

        I mean, every action a police officer takes in any country parallels to some of the worst crimes imaginable. An armed person saying “You are not allowed to leave” is a felony in my country punishable by up to life imprisonment. While people argue about problems with police behavior or severity of criminal penalties, it is generally agreed upon that an arrest of a suspected violent offender is always less severe than civilian kidnapping.

        And perhaps outside of the police, for every person I’ve met who is so anti-cop they consider arresting even a serial-killer unacceptable, I have found common ground of some severe behavior they feel is only rightly done by the party trying to find a peaceful coexistance.

        • ScaraTera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Now I agree that there must be some method of repercussions for weaponizing food, however this is an unideal world. Holding assets’ hostage will only lead to a migration from western assets to maybe Chinese ones, and as a south-east Asian, I can guarantee you that’s the last thing the world needs tight now. Similarly, brash actions using the hegemony of the dollar will only lead to increased scepticism over it and the rise of yuan.

          • abraxas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t really disagree with what you’re saying, but I have a point we should agree on. Your previous discussion point spoke to ethics or morality, to “rules” even between enemies. Your current rebuttal is instead one of pragmatism.

            I agree it may not be pragmatic to respond fully to Russia as would be entirely just. The Nuremburg trials were entirely just (at least in my view), but nobody doubts there are hundreds of rulers that get handshakes instead of a death conviction based entirely on the unreasonable cost, paid by innocents, of doing the right thing.

            The rules at this point suggest Putin should have been stripped of all power and prosecuted by Ukraine. Military conquest is simply unacceptable on the world stage, and that does (or should) apply to all governments at this point. But rules are often only followed when possible and best for everyone

            • ScaraTera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes so I brought up the idea of rules to be followed because in my opinion pragmatism is the only enforcer of said rules. When we talk about using the dollor as the world’s reserve currency pretty much everyone knew USA could freeze assets unilaterally but trusted them not to. Similarly I feel that there are certain untold rules built on trust that simply should not be broken.

              As for idea that military conquest itself is a crime and must lead to Putin’s prosecution. I do not agree with this arbitrary enforcement of this law only because this time around there is a lot of internet awareness over the war. There have been several instances in modern history where a large, supposedly imperial power has invaded a smaller country without the permission of the UN over self interest. I’ll try not to call whataboutism but justice half served is no justice at all.

  • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a really good thing that I’m not President. I have NO patience for this shit. Stopping Ukraine’s food shipments is simply unacceptable. I would have sent the Navy into the Black Sea by now, and possibly started a war with Turkey if they tried to stop the ships.

    The world does not need people like me in charge.

    • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck man I wish our world leaders would actually take action on stuff like this. Direct war with Russia appears to be becoming more and more an inevitable conclusion. They are going to cross a line sooner or later that will necessitate it. The only question is how long will we allow them to fuck over Ukraine/Their neighbors/The world before we do so. I’m anti wars of imperialism but despite what edgy tankies might believe the only imperialism at play in Ukraine is Russian imperialism. And I am absolutely in favor of war to end genocide and Russia is committing genocide.

  • eleitl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fun fact: only 2.5% of the grain went to the poor countries in need. And none of the non-Russian parts of the deal were honored, so not really a surprise it was dropped after Erdogan won the election.

    • paral121@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t really matter where exactly they sell the grain. If there is less grain on the global market, the price will rise, which is very critical for poor countries

  • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the US would start dialogue with China it might actually stand a chance of taking on Russia and winning without destabilizing the region. Direct US intervention in the region would be akin to Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan: it would serve to destabilize the region.

    The US will never consider this because it prefers a weak Russia to a strong China.

  • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe this is because the EU didn’t fulfill their part of the deal to allow for Russian fertilizer exports. And most of the Ukrainian grain was being exported to developed countries, which wasn’t the intent of the deal. This reporting doesn’t reflect all of the facts on why the deal failed. It’s not the Russians being evil.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Showing the data that way does not help at all and it seems fraudulent, most of the grain was going to go to China, which, yeah, is a “developing country” which basically means it’s not the West, but they don’t have much trouble feeding their people or high poverty levels. If you remove China from that list it’s just white people territory mostly. Look at a real graph which was indicated above.

    • hitwright@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although thats quite some mental gymnastics there, mate. Hurr durr, we don’t like what EU is doing by no longer buying from us, so we will force egypt to starve.

      Grow up

    • Joker@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bullshit. The Russians are waging war against a smaller country that was begging to avoid war. And do you remember the Russians were lying all along while they massed troops on the border? They called it a training exercise. The reason anybody is in this situation at all is Russia. The EU doesn’t owe Russia a damn thing.

      Just weeks ago, the Russians destroyed a dam, killing thousands of people and causing an ecological catastrophe. For the past year, they have been teasing a disaster at Zaporizhzhia.

      You are mistaken, friend. Russia is evil.

      • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Russia destroyed a damn under their control, and want to damage a nuclear plant they control? Does that make sense?

        Anyway, the EU doesn’t owe Russia anything because of their invasion, agreed. But the grain export agreement had conditions that the EU admits they failed to fulfill, for example SWIFT access. Please read up on the details if you’re going to debate geopolitics, it’s never as clear as what the news reports.

  • DieguiTux8623@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Higher prices for crops, inflation skyrocketing and higher interest rates for everyone soon arriving! Another turn of the spiral is coming. Western capitalism is the “best” system ever, sure.

    • nodq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you really trying to blame anything else other than Russia? If Putin didn’t invade Ukraine we wouldn’t have these issues and wouldn’t be in the current situation. Sigh…

      • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are mistaken friend. It was actually western capitalists disguised as Russians who invaded Ukraine. Don’t you know that at least 1/3rd of the “troops” invading Ukraine is actually notorious war monger Joe Biden himself in disguise? Stay woke.

            • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I had hoped the imagery of capitalists pretending to be Russian soldiers and 1/3rd of the soldiers being Joe Biden in disguise and saying stay woke was all clues enough that I didn’t need to drop a /s on there but alas

            • ours@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I hope so. These it’s harder and harder to tell the bonkers conspiracies, satire and trolls apart.

      • DieguiTux8623@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really doubt it’s as simple as that. That there is an “external enemy” that needs to be annihilated for the west to be happy and thrive. A film seen too many times. It’s our society that it’s collapsing under its own weight. Financial speculators are ready to grab an opportunity to increase profits and the poorest and most defenseless classes are going to pay a high toll for this. The Greek had a word for what we have done and it’s “hybris” i.e. failing to remember our limits (as human beings) and wanting too much (be if for pride or greed). Rather than blaming others we should blame ourselves. And accept to downscale our economy.

        • LwL@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No shit there are issues with capitalism

          But they have absolutely nothing to do with this situation