• ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. Most people could escape this kind of shit by just switching to linux (which really isn’t hard), but in the workplace you don’t typically get to choose the OS you use.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        As a former computer repair tech who dealt with a lot of average computer users, I’m sorry to tell you that most people cannot switch to Linux. Most people can’t even figure out how to use the super basic Windows features.

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      There has been software like this for decades that could run invisibly, except it was intended for nefarious purposes. Oh wait…

      • JanoRis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        yeah though in some countries employees were still protected from usage of such software or the usage had to be confirmed and agreed. This seems like it could be used as a loophole

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, not really. If the OS starts using the N-word in its UI, no sane company will say “oh well, we can only do nothing but accept that that’s what MS did teehee!”

          They’d better disable that shit, or I’ll just work elsewhere.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t think companies are excited about this as the fediverse thinks. Recall means that now everything done on a computer is subject to their retention policies and subject to discovery in a lawsuit

      I don’t know many companies that are willing to increase their risk that much just to control their employees

    • Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right now I’m terrified that we will have to add local storage to handle this garbage. We use small disks intentionally to push our users to use the network storage, which is backed up. Instead of local storage which is not. I don’t need microsoft keylogging and screencapping my tiny disks to death.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    That’s unpossible because I already assumed it was completely hackable and would result in privacy nightnares, and data leaks across the globe.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I enjoy how Microsoft seems to just sit it out. I get that if they respond to it, it gives more attention to the problem. But genuine security researchers poking holes into your feature, that is not something you can sit out. It will be exploited, if they release it like that.