lmao imagine that

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    6 months ago

    As usual doing malicious compliance, like when they pretended that iOS and iPadOS were two completely separate operating systems and so iPadOS shouldn’t need to support third party app stores as EU said “iOS”

    • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honestly why didn’t EU include all mobile device operating systems or just all operating systems with greater than some number of users?

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Probably because there aren’t any, they can’t specifically say “iOS”.

        I’m not aware of any other operating system (except the ones in game consoles or dedicated hw) that doesn’t allow the user to install other software not approved by the manufacturer

        • TheMonkeyLord
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Would not mind at all if consoles got lumped in and forced to allow alternative app stores

          • taxet_
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            Actually the more I think about it the more it seems like the only, legally fair decision. Either all of them are demanded to allow alternative app stores or none of them are. Why should the consoles be any different in this regard? 🤔

            • Sternhammer@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Indeed. Apple always gets criticised for the 30% ‘Apple Tax’ but the console manufacturers get a free pass for the same thing. Bizarre.