• lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    actually, it depends on who you ask. some will say it’s the kids fault for being so shootable. some will blame it on trans kids or gay people or immigrants. some will blame the libs, some on capitalism, the devil, nonbelivers and others even the president. someone may end up being charged with a war crime, but it’s gonna be entirely random.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Anybody but the weapons manufacturers and investors. I think I heard a popular show say recently “Everything is a product…The end of the fucking world is a product.” The only responsibility any of these people feel is toward their stock prices.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s all based on geography.

      If the school is located in a mineral rich area or underground oil field, then that wasn’t a school, it was a military base and those weren’t students they were terrorists.

      If the school is located in aa area that lacks any natural wealth, then the robots have become autonomous and acted without control by anyone. It was an accident.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      most of those responses are obviously in bad faith, though. How have we gotten to a point where we feel compelled to respond to bad faith at all?