• Transporter Room 3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5311 days ago

        I love listening to researchers talk about places like Ur and Karahan Tepe and all the things we know about in between.

        What I don’t love is the very clear tendency to believe that people 10,000 years ago had the mental capacity of a frog.

        No, I don’t think the pit-like dwellings that don’t have roofs were proof they were savages who lived under the open sky, I think in the TEN THOUSAND YEARS SINCE THEN the roof disintegrated. It’s not a hard concept to put something over your head to stay out of the rain.

        It IS however, hard to make a roof out of mud unless you know where to get special mud and how to cook it. They would have to use branches, leaves and long grasses to keep rain off, which definitely wouldn’t survive 10 millennia.

        So DID they have roofs? No idea, but trying to point at lack of roofs as “proof” of anything is kind of dumb.

        Respect for the ones that straight up say “we don’t know but it’s speculated that…” though

        Also it’s disgusting to me how many times I’ve seen “because the people who found the artifact thought it was heretical/sacreligious/proves their religion wrong they destroyed most of it”

    • @niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1610 days ago

      On a cultural television channel from Mexico, there was a weekly recurring host panel of five or six academics in different fields, all with their PhDs in literature, linguistics, history, political science, etc. La Dichosa Palabra (The Blessed Word) was the name of the show.

      Anyway, one of the panelists always seemed to trace the etymology of every word to the name of such-and-such goddess from antiquity.

      One or two times, ok sure, you get dazzled by the erudition. But when it happens over and over and over again with any word no matter how seemingly trivial, it all acquires a strong whiff of confirmation bias bullshit with nobody to call him out on it.

  • @rockerface@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8711 days ago

    It’s amazing to put into perspective how long both bronze and stone ages really took, especially compared to modernity. Human brains are not good at imagining large quantities or intervals, so it was all kinda smushed up into a folder labeled “past” in my head

    • @ogeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6111 days ago

      To give some numbers, the last period of the stone age (Neolithic) lasted around 2000 years and the bronze age around 1600 years. No wonder they “forgot” what the stone age tools were.

  • @MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5111 days ago

    I can’t even remember why I bought the chives that are sitting in my fridge, we can probably give them a break.

  • @Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2410 days ago

    Not surprised, oral history…

    Being able to write things down has to be one of the more important inventions.

    I seriously suspect if dolphins and whales, ways of storing information they might be more intelligent than us.