• MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That makes no sense.

    My taking issue with oversimplification, doesn’t mean I’m advocating for less thought to be put into the matter.

    It means the opposite.

    We can do better than simply “how much has this been processed” which is just another word for “preparation”.

    “Ultraprocessed” makes it seem like the act of preparing the food somehow ruins it, when the real problem is all the other differences between industrially prepared food vs how you’d turn individual “unprocessed” ingredients into a meal, cookies, or whatever else at home.

    A bowl of noodles consumed in a restaurant, or prepared by you yourself, would be classified exactly the same as a bowl of sodium-overloaded instant ones, because the classification has literally nothing to do with what the food actually contains, merely how far removed it is from a raw ingredient.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That people become more informed?

        It’s better than nothing if people are thinking about whether something they buy is “ultraprocessed”.

        But even better than that is if people know how to identify food that has been prepared in a way that is sane, or if it has been produced specifically to exploit bad consumer habits.

        It’s not a fight. My main goal is literally just to put information where people might read it.