Ford and GM are probably regretting that switch to NACS…

  • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    There are rumors that this was an emotional decision from muskrat, and they will probably be offered their jobs back. Just rumors, but still would not be surprising

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      Who would take them? I mean, I guess you gotta get paid, but when someone demonstrated that they can just drop you with zero warning, trust is negative at that point.

      • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh I agree. There have to be rival companies looking for that exact experience right now. They should not have too much trouble being hired on one of the myriad charging companies out there

        • Gamma@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          Especially since the other companies were planning to support the Tesla network…

      • anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d rejoin for double the wage I previously had. Need to build up an emergency fund for this precarious position.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      One article I read said he likes to fire whole teams and then see which people are asked about. Those are the ones he rehires. If nobody misses you then you were doing a job of value.

      From a human level, this is just shitty. It isn’t the way to treat people.

      • anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s not how research & development works. Nobody asks for a specific person there. Stuff just doesn’t get done.

      • beefcat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        it’s also not a good way of actually figuring out who is critical.

        you can have people who keep the lights on and if they do their job right few even notice they exist.

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Could be supervillain problems 🤣 comments about wishing someone would go away and an underling resolves it’s in a more permanent way …

      Probably not, it’s just that his entire exec team are spineless henchman.

      I think the spacex team is still independent (ish) for now, I fear for them though!

      • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, the exact rumor is he did it to show that he is serious about staffing cuts and that no team is safe, and just made an arbitrary decision

        • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          With that kind of leadership we should be thankful he can’t run for president, or he’d end up voted in.