• onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m not so sure Manjaro should be on this list… This passage in particular gave me pause:

    due to the bleeding edge aspect of arch you will always get the newest versions of software

    Newest, sure, but also not as thoroughly tested. Arch breaks. Not a lot, but still more than, say, Debian or Fedora-based distros. Manjaro should be for intermediate users, imho.

    • Halce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      To be fair though, Debian is often ridicoulously outdated in terms of how many versions behind the current versions of software they ship, without updating for the longest time.

    • Tux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      “Arch breaks. Not a lot, but still more than, say, Debian or Fedora-based distros”, huh i thought it was the other way around and arch breaks less.

    • dandelion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Manjaro Linux is different from Arch Linux. Manjaro is quite slow with updates, because they do test before releasing.