• dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      In Vietnam? Not sure. The French seemed to have a lasting benefit from doing this to every landlord they could lay hands on in the late 1700s, though.

    • dalë@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Has the death sentence been a deterrent for any crime?

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No it’s a big show for statists to show how strong and dominating they are. It’s not about your lowly practical concerns. It doesn’t even matter of they kill the right one. As long as blood is spilled. The anger of the masses will be sated for a little while and all will know there is no escape from the violence of the state.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The death penalty in this case isn’t to deter future crime of the same type. It’s to remove a specific type of malignant cancer from society and ensure that it can’t spread to others. All of her cohorts that could be punished were sentenced for a range of time and a fine as is appropriate.