• hydropticOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jordan_Gatling#Gatling_gun

    In 1877, he wrote, “It occurred to me that if I could invent a machine gun which could by its rapidity of fire, enable one man to do as much battle duty as a hundred, that it would, to a large extent supersede the necessity of large armies, and consequently, exposure to battle and disease would be greatly diminished.”

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why would he not realize that countries, generals, kings, and those in power would simply send more men to die? They will not send 2 guys with a machine gun and then simply accept that the battle was lost if their guy loses. No, they will send a million men, as many as are needed to take another foot of ground.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 month ago

        Colonialism was super popular, so a couple of dudes with machine guns could mow down a field of natives with much less risk.

        Plus a machine gun is much more impressive than some dudes with single fire guns. A platoon (or whatever fits on a boat or three) can be overrun. Throw a couple of machine guns in with a couple of brutal shows of force and you got yourself a colony.

        WW1 was still a ways off and it wasn’t really the target market for your Gatlings and Maxims.

      • hydropticOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

        He was clearly not a stupid man by any means, but definitely seems like he was naive.