• @webghost0101
    link
    31 month ago

    They wont give up the power to trample on our rights but there still our rights.

    I am taking a natural rights perspective here, important to note cause i feel some people interpret “rights” as a system of a legal framework rather then natural justice

    • @Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      I think we only have rights when we have the “violence” to defend them. We need them to be part of a legal framework so that we can use state violence to enforce their existence, otherwise it’s just “might makes right” and no one has to respect what rights you think you have, nor will they if they stand in the way of profit. :(

      • @webghost0101
        link
        21 month ago

        State violence to enforce rights is what police is supposed to be now.

        Human progress has gotten pretty far in understanding physical, but also psychological human needs and we are also rediscovering more and more things about our ecological biomes needs.

        I believe that trough proper lifelong education we can come to realize a common understanding of respect for each other needs including their emotional bonds to for examples a house or a golden ring.

        This cant possibly be a a one size fits all situation, equity over equality each according to their needs and capabilities.

        This would probably rely on local trust within communities.

        I think we would find that while all people are different we are globally similar enough in our needs and desires that once we get rid of central powers things wont be to different when going elsewhere. It be natural to respect the minor differences.

        Sounds like sm tribalism hippy stuff but what should not be forgotten that we have modern technology and the internet. Ideas can and are spreading globally.

        Got no clue what your name is m or where you live but lemmy is proof that without corpos wher much more united.