• @allywilson
    link
    166 months ago

    This is nothing to do with the OS.

    He has a point though, you haven’t refuted that.

      • @allywilson
        link
        336 months ago

        Because you’re confusing the difference between an OS, an application and a protocol.

        • @Pratai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          I didn’t say it WAS the OS, I said it is part of it. Stop arguing semantics. We’re done here.

          • @allywilson
            link
            32
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            creating an app that essentially copped their proprietary OS

            The OS hasn’t been ‘copped’. They emulated the protocol, and your lack of understanding and confusing the two has led us to having this conversation.

          • FZDC
            link
            fedilink
            206 months ago

            Stop arguing semantics. We’re done here.

            Compare to Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass:

            “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master——that’s all.

            Yeah, if you want to make up your own definitions to the words you use, and then order those around you to stop arguing semantics, then you’re basically not having a conversation at all.

            Your comment was confusing because you don’t seem to understand what is or isn’t part of an operating system, and the mere mention of the operating system was pretty far removed from any relevance to your own point.

            It’s a proprietary service, and if you want to argue that companies can run proprietary services in a closed manner, denying access to third party clients, cool, that can be your position, but it would be an incoherent position to claim that only OS developers should have that right.

            • @Pratai@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              36 months ago

              and if you want to argue that companies can run proprietary services in a closed manner, denying access to third party clients, cool, that can be your position

              Can it really? Cool! Thanks! That’s my position then.