• naeap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    well, I’m not sure.

    We’re not only fighting heavy pollution of stuff that’s hard to get rid of. all microorganism approaches need be really inspected for safety. look at the fungus that grows at and around the Jack Daniels plant. it isn’t really a concern for health, but it’s still everywhere.
    now we have the nutrition for this microorganisms everywhere, so they could probably flourish everywhere - including inside of us.

    and besides the population we are hit with heavy social problems because of capitalism and reduced birth rates. also it seems global tensions are starting to rise when before migration because of climate change - have 2 billion people in mind, but I’m not sure if it really was “by 2027”

    I just think, that we have so many problems at once and nobody seems to care even for the obvious ones

    • FuzzyPlantEnthusiast@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Okay. I guess caring about finding practical solutions to our problems is a waste of brain cells. Have fun in your echo chamber of misery!

      • naeap
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        nah, I’m very open to suggestions and ideas. I’m just also trying to see the problematic side of it. this solution need to work on a very large scale. this just isn’t as easy as releasing microorganisms - or even holding them locally in treat water can be risky.

        edit: autocorrect…