Founded slrpnk.net, now exploring other paths :)
no one said to not use codeberg, i just said to deactivate issues there
unifying the place where people talk and report
some people prioritize the git forge for this and leave out the rest, but this basically says ‘‘we don’t want you’’ to all non developers
I’m not sure if you are referring to some particular situations but I totally get the feeling
Maybe it’s time to rework the issues pipeline.
No more chats, no more zulip, no more GitHub issues
A piefed community for feature requests and one for issues, with a bot chained to linear or similar and mods to help you without being devs or learning git etc
Single source of truth, on your own platform :o
P.S. and deep focus timeblocks or communication timeblocks
I know, don’t worry. Hence why I wanted to just check the roadmap to see the direction, not trying to shape it as I’d like 😃
Don’t see zulip as a chat, it’s a forum with a chat interface. So yes, making another account for a specific forum is not that bad.
to be honest, what i need is an open notion, so a lot of the stuff i want from joplin is just not gonna make it
but, regarding the apps themselves, i for sure would like a better experience and overall polish. Even obsidian is just a note app markdown based, but the experience is just better with gestures, shortcuts, nested tags, tags sidebar and so on
so maybe i’d say that i’d like joplin to be an open obsidian 🤔
il discorso qui è proprio trattare l’llm come un’utenza che puoi cambiare in ogni momento a costo zero. In più c’è un discorso di proxying…
Non so se da mastodon non ti faceva vedere il link ma eccolo https://www.edenai.co/post/top-european-alternatives-to-openrouter
Ovviamente utile solo per vedere la lista, probabilmente è pieno di cazzate per il resto :D
Do you happen to have a way to search without making an account?
tbf op said they made a flag, not “THE” flag :)
Ohhhh ok it’s less bad than i thought! Thank you for the clarification
Just to be clear:
basically, until now, instance ban was not an actual instance ban but “ban from the communities that person had in cache from my instance”?
So if, for example, a new community was made, the person could just write there like not instance banned?
I’m fine with letting the frog decide which communities get deleted and to close community creation after formal request to the frog
for reddit it happens that when an item reaches the ‘‘top month’’ status, it gets added to the rss
It’s acceptable for some communities, not for others…
To be fair I also don’t like the fact that “private” usually means that the server admins can still read what’s inside. I get it for images but for text…
MLS on activitypub is very much needed
The weakest link is the social element.
From one sysadmin to watch, now there would be at least 2. It’s better to not give a false sense of security, so I understand why one would not federate them at all.
Maybe “gated” communities would be better rather than private in the case you refer to
The public records from the companies that sell stocks are not so useful anyway.
Obviously I’d prefer to know more about Proton spending, but the examples made in the video like “I want to know how much proton has spent on that YouTube ad” are just impossible. You can open an Apple shareholders report and check it yourself.
Still, I’d rather have no capitalism rather than capitalism + financial transparency reports. One day they will sue you if you don’t pursuit more profit. Not gonna happen with foundations.
edit: I misread the comment and answered like you were referring to openai and google and not mozilla and wikipedia, sorry
It’s like saying Mozilla is a for profit or Wikipedia is a for profit.
Having a for profit company under the non profit ownership is just to ease bureaucracy.
This doesn’t change the fact that the ultimate owner is the foundation and so there is no shareholder to pressure etc.
A counter argument to this could have been exploring the OpenAI case and how it’s trying to get out of the no profit model. But for some reason privacy YouTubers never make that much research into stuff… Almost like they are just earning on that engagement that you get when not being boringly nuanced :)
The YouTuber also states that 9 privacy policies are bad and tbh Proton could probably unify some of them but the thing is that they are actually different: they said in the past, for example, that privacy laws for VPNs in Switzerland are better than those for emails, so it’s pretty ok to have 2 different privacy policies (I wonder if they could at least unifiy drive, mail calendar ones). Google can have just one because it’s simply “we gather as much data as we can” for every service they have.
as you sensed, it’s under the website control: readers just check the rss ‘‘file’’ and show it to you in a nice way, every now and then they check for new articles and if your readers supports it you can save the older ones as they come
there can be also limits hardcoded in the reader that don’t let you take more than x items from a new feed but anyway the most majority of rss files just have the last y items, it’s rare that they expose everything (it would be a mess)
The road to hell is paved with good intentions
yes, but we would go back to having more sources of truth that are heavier on the devs, even because of the repetitions and scattering of the same topics
why do you take single part of my message and answer to them like they are not part of the whole message blaze :(
first i said that single source of truth etc and then i pointed out that the single source has not to be dev oriented, don’t answer to my second point with the issue of the first point
that is not true, there are a lot of kanbans and ticketing software that can be used; to be fair, i should have said deactivating the possibility to open and comment except by mantainers
and in the system i proposed, you could still join and comment issues and features on piefed anyway (if you are not one of the piefed people)