• amanneedsamaid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This would be possible if there was a material unaffected by gravity, right?

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you accelerate the passenegers to the same speed as the train while they board, then you can solve one of those problems. I suggest firing them out of a canon.

        • drolex
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Keep the ideas coming guys, this is a great brainstorming session. I think you have solved most of the practical issues. I’ll talk to the investors, but I think WE are almost there!

          On a related note, everyone in the R&D department is being terminated.

        • necromancyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          What if we figure out a way to safely transport people IN something like a missile, self propelled, and can be launched on a schedule. Then we wouldn’t need the train at all!

          • SterlingVapor@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Missiles are super inefficient. You have to overcome gravity while fighting air resistance at the same time, which requires unreasonable energy density

            If only there was some way to use air resistance to fight gravity, or better yet even some sort of metal road to push against to lower required acceleration to the minimum…

            Maybe if we made a super slow missile on rails? Never mind, this sounds crazy now that I say it out loud

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think in that case, the earth would just depart the location of the train, leaving it drifting in space.

      • amanneedsamaid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I was assuming the rails are strong enough to keep the train on the Earth, but I guess infinite friction from the movement and rotation of the Earth probably isn’t survivable by any railway material. Hypothetically, if you had a material unaffected by gravity (train), and a material that is absolutely invincible (the rails, and they are anchored to the center of the Earth), now does it work?

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s impossible to even reason about what something entirely unaffected by gravity might or might not do because everything, including gravity, is relative. Something not affected by Earth’s gravity would probably get carried away by the wind, but something not affected by the Sun’s gravity would float away from the sun (relative to the Earth) and appear to have some sort of mysterious acceleration from our perspective. If the object isn’t affected by the Milky Way’s gravity, even more shenanigans.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No, the problem is not gravity, is that the train attached to earth has velocity dictated by the Earth movements, and keeps it because of inertia. In your theoretical experiment, the train would be launched on space at constant velocity.