Sure Todd, lol

  • Hasuris
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IRL the stakes are a little higher, don’t you think?

      • Hasuris
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No shit? That was the point

        Astronauts aren’t bored in space because they’re busy trying not to die. games don’t kill you when you fuck up or something goes wrong

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, they do, just not for real. Why would you expect it to kill you for real? What an absurd standard. You’re supposed to be scared for your character’s life, not your own. They’re the one in space, not you…

          Have you ever played games before?

          • Hasuris
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You do know this threat is about some dev saying the first guys on the moon weren’t bored although there’s basically just sand and rocks to be found? And that because of this it’s fine most planets in a game are baren and uninteresting?

            The Bethesda guy compared the game to RL. I am just pointing out why this makes no sense.

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And what you said was incorrect.

              In RL most of the “excitement” in space comes from not wanting to fuck up and die. Games don’t have that, Todd.

              So many games are all about the struggle to not fuck up and die, and they are plenty tense even though they don’t affect your real body. Ever played Subnautica? I’m not actually underwater but I’m scared of drowning.

              I don’t know why the fact that a game can’t actually kill you doesn’t mean it can’t try to introduce tension.

              Yeah, planets being barren is shit and realism is a shit excuse for it, but it’s kinda irrelevant to your “games don’t have dying” point, which would apply even if planets were designed better

              • Hasuris
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Dude… You’re even agreeing with me without realizing it. My point is, because a game can’t create tension by threatening you with real death, it needs to be interesting in some way.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Again with this bizarre obsession with games killing people… did you just finish watching Stay Alive?

                  No, that is not the reason games need to be interesting. No ove ever wanted games to kill people, dude.

                  • Hasuris
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    It’s a reason why the astronauts weren’t bored on the moon. The fear of death. Games don’t have that and that is one of the reasons games need to be interesting and can’t be dull like the moon. I’ll just rephrase the same thing over and over for you. I do see some things may appear challenging to understand for some.

                    Read the title of the article and you may be able to piece things together: Bethesda says most of Starfield’s 1000+ planets are dull on purpose because ‘when the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there’ but ‘they certainly weren’t bored’