I’m not sure if it’s just the larger instances getting the brunt of it, or if we’ve been quietly handling it in the background, but I just wanted to float the question in case it’s something you have to be actively looking out for.

I would hate for this community to get taken down due to bad actors elsewhere.

  • Nollij
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s a few specific types of vulnerabilities, and there are many nuances of the law to consider. But we, along with literally every single platform that allows user content, are vulnerable to all of them.

    Right now, the discussion is around a specific community (now closed) on Lemmy.world. Any server that federates with them and has users subscribed to that community will have links to it, and may have the content cached.

    There’s also the risk of local users that upload directly to this server. Any server that allows images/videos to be directly uploaded is vulnerable.

    There’s yet another risk that a user may create a post linking to material stored elsewhere. I’m not sure how this works from a legal standpoint, but it’s certainly not a good situation to be in.

    The good news is that this isn’t something new or unique to Lemmy. Facebook gets close to 100 million reports per year. Twitter, Reddit, etc all have comparable numbers.

    The bad news is that Lemmy (and the rest of the Fediverse) is developed and operated almost exclusively by volunteers and donations. There may not be the resources needed to address these issues as needed.