I’m confident that someone will get caught and be made into an example.

Whether they were the one that actually did it is immaterial.

“There is always a well-known solution to every human problem–neat, plausible, and wrong”

-H. L. Mencken

What, specifically, are you concerned they might do, or might become? Are you afraid this might become a predatory sexual relationship? That he might become codependent? That the older guy is immature and will be a bad influence?

When you can define your concerns, it will reveal what action (if any) is appropriate.

What kind of engineering? Designing what? How’s your local market for those positions? Is it something that can be done remotely, and thus you could apply to positions nationwide?

The really short version is that if you aren’t finding positions, you’re in the wrong line of work or location. If you’re finding positions and applying, but not getting any responses, then your resume/etc is bad. If you are getting responses but no offers, then your interview technique is bad.

You’ll see what you want to see. Many Harris supporters are rushing to stock up before the expected economic disaster

You’re assuming that the tariffs exist in a vacuum. They do not.

As soon as vendors feel they can blame Trump/tariffs/whatever and not lose income, they will raise prices. Their costs don’t need to actually go up - and if called out, they can say they’re just responding to the uncertainty or whatever.

“Racism is not a known side effect of Ambien”

We all know that was just an excuse. No one actually cared about the substance.

If it makes you feel better, the harm was going to happen with or without you. At least this way, that value isn’t going to someone that is pushing more harm.

Related, “If the penalty for a crime is a fine, then that law only exists for the lower class”

There would need to be real penalties, with enforcement. Turns out we have neither.

The guy said he frequented the place back in college. Even if he was from abroad, he would’ve picked up on this common social cue during that time.

Germany passed a number of laws in the wake of the Third Reich and the Holocaust. The idea being that if such speech was banned, it could prevent the next one from getting a foothold. It definitely sounds like this is what they’re referring to

This is really going to depend on the jurisdiction in question. National, regional, and even local differences can drastically change the answer.

You’re solving a very different problem. You’re addressing how to make restrooms better for all members of Congress.

The bill in question is about how to publicly hurt a minority group, in order to galvanize their supporters.

Do you have a source on that?

It can be because of certain individuals, but it must apply equally to all.

You didn’t usually see it applied to a real person, but there are countless examples of it being applied to large corporations. For example, Florida can (and has) passed laws that apply to (e.g.) all amusement parks that operate their own emergency services. It was pretty clear that it would only affect Disney World. But at least in theory, it would apply to any others that opened up.

It would be interesting to see how that plays out in court. That clip shows that the CEO himself is aware of the concerns, and refuses to address them. It also implicitly acknowledges that the reasoning was because of those issues, and not a conspiracy to harm ex-Twitter.

Depending on where you are, double check the chargers where you would need them. Plug share is useful for this, particularly in their trip planning mode (desktop only). I’ve found that there are a lot more chargers on my routes than I had initially thought, and it only required slight changes in my plans to use them.

But Dr Drew is a reasonably competent doctor.

More importantly, would he be an obedient servant of the king, and follow his bidding (and delusions) without question? Because that’s the only thing that really matters here.

He wants them to help the next time. That’s a pretty tangible benefit