• webghost0101
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    26 days ago

    Did she actually need to pay and how would this hold up in court?

    At most creative they can say the ex technically stole the vehicle.

    • bizarroland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Multiple things.

      1, This almost certainly didn’t happen.

      2, If it did happen, we wouldn’t be hearing about it.

      3, Chances are, even if it did happen, and we’re hearing about it, the car would have been towed from the airport for being abandoned long before it racked up $100,000 in tickets.

      And 4, Even if it did happen, and the car didn’t get towed, and it racked up $100,000 worth of tickets, The reason we’re hearing about it is the guy who planned this “revenge” ended up having to pay the fines, because he got caught.

        • bizarroland@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          26 days ago

          Because if it did happen successfully, then he wouldn’t have gotten caught, and therefore we wouldn’t be hearing about it.

            • naeap
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              I’m not sure, if I’m following

              OC says, if he wouldn’t be caught, we wouldn’t hear about it
              You say, you see nothing, that he hasn’t been caught

              Maybe I’m out of the logic loop here, but isn’t that exactly OC’ argument?

          • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            Or you know, he’s bragging about screwing his ex on social media… you know how many people post commiting crimes online?