Japan exported about $600 million worth of aquatic products to China in 2022, making it the biggest market for Japanese exports, with Hong Kong second. Sales to China and Hong Kong accounted for 42% of all Japanese aquatic exports in 2022, according to government data.

    • Pseu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cancer risk from radiation is not just the absolute amount of exposure, but the duration of the exposure as well. Short high-intensity radiation doses carry higher risk than long, low-intensity doses.

      And 100mSv/yr is a rate, which is greater than 44mSv/yr. After 4 years, you will still have not had the dose needed that is linked with increased cancer risk.

      • culprit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        if you live there for a year it’s 44000 μSv, or 44 mSv

        44 x 3 = 132 which is GREATER than 100

        • deegeese
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can’t compare exposure over 3 years to a limit for one year.

          Radiation damage depends on time period of exposure.

          • p1mrx@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Though I still wouldn’t want to live there; the area has been evacuated for good reason.

          • culprit@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            the graph on the map is μSv/h

            using the crosshairs shows 29.88 μSv/h at the waterfront by the plant

            that is 0.02988 μSv/h = 261.7488 mSv/a

            so not a place I’d want to get food from to say the least

            • deegeese
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Sure, just pick a completely different location to suit the conclusion you already made.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              That’s on land. Where a whole bunch of various radionuclides have concentrated and remain fixed in place.

              This “wastewater release” that’s being discussed is the release of low-intensity tritium that will immediately dilute into the whole ocean. You’re comparing apples to moonrocks. Completely different things.