I want to get into Arch Linux, but I don’t have that much experience and I feel like it’ll be easier to set it up in a virtual machine rathen than dual booting, I’ve used Oracle VirtualBox before but it’s very laggy. Are there any other VMs that aren’t as laggy, or do I just have a hardware issue?

  • SpaceCadet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Desktop usage is almost always going to feel laggy in a VM because you don’t have a real GPU inside the VM and it will fallback to some non-accelerated framebuffer mode. There are some GPU virtualization solutions, for example QEMU has virgl that offers 3D acceleration, but in my experience it’s buggy/not ready and doesn’t offer near bare metal performance.

    The only way to get near bare metal graphical performance in a VM is by using PCI pass through of an entire GPU, but that requires an extra GPU, is non-trivial to setup and comes with a lot of caveats.

      • SpaceCadet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Probably not. There are no implementations that I’m aware of that work well on a Linux guest.

    • Papamousse@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t worry, if he installs Arch from scratch, it will take him a long time before even having internet connection or installing X.

      • SpaceCadet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s just a meme. If you can follow some basic instructions, you can setup arch.

      • akash_rawal@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Dunno why are people spreading this myth… Arch is not that hard to install and you don’t get a gold medal for installing it. I installed it with LXDE in an office machine, it only took me an hour.