• Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dressing up as the enemy is actually a war crime.

    • Mpatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s war, and when you are being invaded by greedy bastards. There are no war crimes.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Not back then it wouldn’t be, though, if we take the veracity of the story at face value. The inclusion of perfidy (bad-faith deception, such as dressing up as a civilian or opposing force) as a banned act within the Geneva Conventions was only adopted in 1977, under articles 37 and 39 of Additional Protocol I.

      Edit: And even today, Article 39 exempts naval engagements specifically from that provision when it comes to flying the wrong colors with intent to deceive.

    • baines@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      war crimes are whatever the dominate military power says it is the other guy is doing

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think all military companies should keep their formal uniforms from whever time period they were formed. Imagine the photos from military banquets or 4th of July celebrations if one company is in WW2 era formal wear, another is Civil War, and another is from the Napoleonic era! It would be so cool to watch

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          To be fair: A lot of things that are war crimes today were declared as such specifically because of WWI. Meaning that they weren’t war crimes when they were committed during the war. Specifically chemical agents (mustard gas and friends) had never been seen before, so there obviously was no treaty banning their use until after the fact.

            • Agent641@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 hours ago

              They were so progressive about women having a safe space to congregate they introduced a miles-long no-mans-land in France.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only if you engage under the enemy’s colors. Otherwise it’s a ruse of war, and legitimate.

      • Sibbo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Then thank the British for stopping this potential war crime.