HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden’s press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

  • vga
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 个月前

    It’s reasonable to suspect that woke politics was one of the issues that made them do so badly. As the elections have been lost already, there’s no reason to maintain that pretense anymore.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      Tell you what - go ahead and try to put into words what you think ‘woke politics’ are without being bigoted or breaking comm rules and then I’ll be happy to share why I think you might be more comfortable hanging out at a nazi bar.

      • vga
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 个月前

        The problem is not the core goals of woke, which I understand to be inclusivity and social justice. The problem is perfomative outrage and a relentless search for microaggressions. This will alienate people who might in other circumstances be – if not allies – at least sympathetic to the causes.

          • vga
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 个月前

            deleted by creator

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 个月前

              Because if you find the protection of rights for minorities to be objectionable then you’d find good company with people who think those people don’t deserve protection.

              But if you want to be vague about what it is you consider objectionable then there’s nothing I can do but speculate

                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  30 天前

                  No, i read everything you wrote and then asked for clarification, but you called that ‘moving the goal posts’, so I just used what was given to speculate.

                  ‘Woke’ is frequently used as a reactionary dog whistle and is typically meant very broadly to mean ‘non-white cis male issues’. I still think youd be more comfortable at a nazi bar.

    • Zaktor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      That’s not reasonable at all. Harris did almost nothing to support minority rights and definitely didn’t do anything that would remotely qualify as performative. Centrists got exactly the campaign they wanted, you can’t run from the failure by throwing vulnerable people under the bus even harder.