• overload
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d be really interested to know my heritage but this scenario actively is stopping me from doing so.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s okay, you can just be like me and have both your parents do it! They may not know my exact data, but they’ve got enough to guess.

    • intelisense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I really don’t get this. I know where my parents and grandparents came from. Should I care if I have Irish or African blood? It baffles me that anyone does. How would that information would change my life? We should be judged by our actions, not by the origin of our distant ancestors.

      • overload
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you get disease risk data, which does give you some useful info.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Knowing whether I have First Nations blood on my mother’s side would have real legal benefits for me (my mom is estranged from her family and so has never told me much about them, but there’s some possibility there given their historical context). I know a friend who had to prove he was 1/8 Metis in order to get a job as a web designer with a particular company.

        I think it’s ridiculous and flat out racist, frankly, but there are indeed benefits in this day and age from having particular ancestry.

        • naeap
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Holy fuck, how is this legal?

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 month ago

            “Good intentions”, I presume.

            My position has always been “if there are people who are disadvantaged then pass laws to help disadvantaged people rather than making the assumption that everyone with a particular set of genetics need help.” I guess it’s just easier to take that shortcut though.

          • can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            There are lots of special considerations for a legal standpoint concerning Native Americans because technically they compromise several semi-sovereign nations within the US’s borders. Some of the treaties the US signed with them during westward expansion are still enforceable.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m of the same mind. Luckily my entire family is fairly skeptical of things like this. While we want to know more about our ancestry (we know the culture we’re from as it’s pretty well documented, we would like to hone down where exactly we’re most likely from. Our last name hints at it in the region but it’s still unclear.) I would rather travel across the ocean and do manual research than give my DNA to any of the ancestry companies.

      • can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        The people who most benefit from DNA ancestry are people who want to know where they came from but documentation is scarce or non-existent. In the US that group is primarily composed of the descendents of slaves. It can also help people descendent of native groups who only know that they are from some native people of North America identity a particular tribe.