• misk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s going to support more systems, eventually, unofficially. Analogue Pocket takes in Gameboy carts (and some other systems with official adapters) but there are also plenty of community cores, some brand new, some ported from Mister. Unfortunately those Pocket ones won’t be compatible :/

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      If it was a hardware platform with existing support for other emulators, I’d say it still may be useful. All I’m seeing is an expensive piece of specialized hardware that retails with a single use. Because its FPGA, of course it can be reprogrammed to do whatever on the fly, but why go this route when you already have plenty of x86 or ARM software out there that already does that.

      It just seems SUPER specific and singularly focused with no added benefits for the price tag is all.

      • misk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        FPGA is cycle accurate which requires very powerful hardware if you wanted to do it with software emulation, especially when you get to 5th gen consoles. It’s for the people that want an „end-game” setup that’s as good as original hardware, can handle multiple systems and give you much more flexibility. It doesn’t cost all that much when you compare it to original hardware, mods and scalers it would require to connect to new displays. I’m actually very surprised how cheap A64 is, expected at least twice as much.

        But, if you’re not that type of crazy then playing on your own PC, Ambernic and similar stuff is good enough and super convenient.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Cycle accurate just means the FPGA runs the same cycles as the reference hardware of whatever it’s programmed to be doing. In this case, an N64.

          But the point of software emulation is to skip all of that noise and be more portable in the first place. The only real reason I can think to go with FPGA in this case is 1) to sidestep lawsuits, and 2) to possibly expand functionality in the future.

          • misk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It might seem like an overkill but cycle accurate emulation is in many ways easier, just way less performant. Back in the day devs wrote software in a way that would leverage different timings between different pieces of hardware to achieve things that wouldn’t be possible otherwise like full screen parallax scrolling on Gameboy. Software emulators have to identify those cases and implement workarounds for them. Some edge cases are unresolved for years leading to bugs of varying severity. You can see a rundown of such cases on Analogue Pocket in this video.