Amazon trying to cover their ass?

Updated Wednesday, September 4, 2024 5:10 p.m. EST - Amazon reached out to deny the reports of a crack down on singing along with the radio in trucks and provided this PR video clip as evidence. A PR spokesperson told Jalopnik: “This post is completely inaccurate. Amazon has never issued guidance or communications to Delivery Service Partners that prohibits singing in the vehicle.”

https://youtu.be/3ddtY_iOrk8

  • MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re not actually monitoring that specific thing. They have a camera looking at the drivers and the recognition software happens to interpret singing as the driver being “distracted”, but they don’t actually want to modify the software so they are doubling down on what the software has decided.

    • FarFarAway@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Kinda the same way my car tells me I’m not looking at the road if I tilt my head 2 inches to the side or back. Its constantly giving me warning, and I’m constantly yelling that I am looking at the road! How else could I go around this turn!

      At least I have the option of covering it with black electrical tape. Jeeze.

      • DrPop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        As someone who wears glasses I have to turn my head to check my mirrors. I would get so frustrated with that.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Debatable.

        Should car radio/stereos be illegal then?

        • bleistift2
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I, for one, am in favor of volume limits. Too many times ambulances get stuck behind cars whose drivers simply cannot hear the siren.

        • eramseth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not necessarily, but there’s a difference between something being illegal and something being perceived by an insurance company as increasing risk. There are a lot of things that are legal and risky.

          • MentalEdge
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Insurance wanting employees monitored so they can deny coverage or excuse an increase in premiums is not much of “ok yeah that makes sense”.

            With that logic our own cars are going start monitoring us and have us hand the data over to insurers so they can let you off the hook for the “privacy fee” or whatever as long as you then don’t sing in your own car.

            This isn’t about risk. Its about humans not being allowed to be humans.

            • eramseth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oh I totally agree and yes we’re already on that path.

              The solution here is probably more like no cameras spying on your employees for every second of their shift. Give them a job and let them do it or not do it.