Given that international auxiliary languages allow for more efficient cooperation; I think more people should consider using an easily learnable IAL, like Esperanto.

IALs would reduce the English dominance that gate-keeps software development to English persons; and hence allow more potential software developers to better develop software. The English language is mostly dominant in software development because of linguistic imperialism.

  • AmiceseOP
    3•1 year ago

    It’s rather obvious you don’t see what I’m talking about. Even when you QUOTE IT.

    English, to take a horrifically terrible language at random, is not much harder to learn for, say, a Chinese speaker

    That is a sweeping generalization you made. How would Esperanto be harder for a Chinese person than English?

    See that there, Sparky? That’s you claiming I said the precise opposite of what I said.

    Uh, how is that the opposite of what I said? Oh. I see. Yeah that was idiotic. However, don’t be so damn rude to me for making a mistake; because that dis-motivates me from trying to learn from a mistake.

    Still, by complexity, English would take longer to learn than Esperanto.

    (Also, what’s a Sparky?)

    (Note, also, that I very clearly called English a “horrifically terrible language” yet the rest of your response to that was acting as if I said English were a good language.

    All I said was:

    How are declensions by X idiotic? Also by what? You didn’t complete the list.

    Is English declension idiotic too?

    I didn’t say anything about the English language being bad. How could that be implied to say that English is a bad language?