• 9 Posts
  • 184 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 12th, 2026

help-circle

  • Lehmuusa@nord.pubto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Interesting… Historically the prefix ge- has meant doing something completely. For example, there used to be the verb winnen, which meant “to fight victoriously”. In German it’s nowadays “gewinnen”, constructed from meaning “fighting victoriously all the way until finish”, or more shortly: “to win.” And in English the it has lost the infinite form’s ending “-en”, and is nowadays just “win” (or “to win”).

    And then in German a device with -ge in front of its name means it’s assembled out of several parts that somehow function together. So, I’d say based on this that the back three quarters of this … animal? … either technically consists of an amount of hogs, or are several independent components that together form a hog. And do that without having a head.

    If you add a he(a)d zu dem Gehog, it becomes a full-fledged animal capable of both locomotion and thought. And spikety-spike-spiky pokey things.

    Of course it could also be that “gehog” does not have the prefix “ge” at all, but is instead “geh” + “og”. That would again be German, and would mean “an og that walks”. And an “og” would probably be the same thing as the Dutch “oog” and the German “Auge”: An eye. So, if you take a walking eye and add a hed to it, you get a hedgehog… Ouch.

    NEVER DISASSEMBLE A HEDGEHOG!

    a.k.a. hedbeholder



  • Ukraine’s drones have enough range to just fly over SPb and then along the Baltic Sea. This could also explain why there was a military drone flying in the airspace over Helsinki just a while ago. Maybe the Russia managed to direct it off course when it was on the way to Kaliningrad?

    But, another possible scenario is indeed that they were launched from a container on some cargo ship. It’s not necessarily possible for the Russia to find out what ship was used.












  • why you elected to make a statement that seemed to limit itself to a binary of fascist/"tankies”.

    Because that is the subject we are talking about. We are talking about to what extent tankies are similar to fascists.

    Also, I do not think temporarily holding a percent of an ethnicity in an internment camp is enough to call something a genocide.

    Temporarily, not. But anything that forces people to have to lose their national or thnic identity is genocide. We are not talking about any temporary internment camps here. (I’m not sure if temporary internment camps based on ethnicity have ever even existed…)

    to provide relevant comparison of similar examples that were not fascist nor “tankies”.

    If they do not support using a country’s military against its own population nor are fascists, how are they relevant to this discussion that is intentionally limited to those two groups?

    First of all……how is the US not a democratic country?

    Uh… Read the news maybe? WTF kind of question is this? How is it a democratic country?

    Just off the top of my head Canada has a brutal history of suppressing their native inhabitants that endures to the modern age. Both france and the UK also had interment camps during ww2.

    No idea of what’s been going on in Canada. POW camps don’t really count. Nor any camps where the goal is not the removal of an ethnicity or nationality from from a region.
    The question about Israel’s democracy is an interesting one that I need to ponded more!




  • I believe at the point they have already become tankies, no good goal exists anymore. They only seem to work to defend what they have already achieved. And that is oppression.

    I’m not sure socialism or communism can ever be made to work, but at least Marx and Lenin made it much more difficult to ever get there by demandinfmg we do the opposite of the goals of communism in order to get communism. People who are okay with cleansings and repression will cleanse and repress.

    You don’t really go through the chore of reading Capital without really wanting to change the society for better. And because Marx, the death of communism, preferred violence and is convincing with his way of argumentation (at least if you’re a bit stupid), those who read the book until the end, end up forfeiting all good goals and will go for repression.

    Tankies are people who used to want good things and fairness. And then they converted from that into tankies.

    A strong leader will always lead you into a Russia. Into a quagmire.