stux⚡ @geddit.social to Twitter@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoTwitter is now completely "walled" (dont wanna rattle cages with a wrong title whoopsie)message-squaremessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up167arrow-down1message-squareTwitter is now completely "walled" (dont wanna rattle cages with a wrong title whoopsie)stux⚡ @geddit.social to Twitter@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square111fedilinkfile-text
On this moment you’ll need an account to view anything on the platform… Every day the bird dies a little more
minus-squareassbutt@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy does it have to have some buzzword name? You can no longer view twitter without an account. Damn, that was complicated.
minus-squareKraiden@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year ago You can no longer view WSJ without paying. Damn, that was complicated.
minus-squareassbutt@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down3·1 year agoWhat point do you think you’ve made, exactly? There’s a key difference between WSJ and Twitter in that WSJ is actually paywalled.
minus-squareassbutt@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down3·1 year agoNo, you’re just a dipshit. You think you have some clever point, but you don’t even get what the fuck we’re talking about. Work on that reading comprehension, you’ll get there someday.
Why does it have to have some buzzword name?
You can no longer view twitter without an account. Damn, that was complicated.
What point do you think you’ve made, exactly? There’s a key difference between WSJ and Twitter in that WSJ is actually paywalled.
deleted by creator
No, you’re just a dipshit. You think you have some clever point, but you don’t even get what the fuck we’re talking about. Work on that reading comprehension, you’ll get there someday.
deleted by creator