The words [Equity-language] guides recommend or reject are sometimes exactly the same, justified in nearly identical language.

Although the guides refer to language “evolving,” these changes are a revolution from above. They haven’t emerged organically from the shifting linguistic habits of large numbers of people.

Prison does not become a less brutal place by calling someone locked up in one a person experiencing the criminal-justice system.

The whole tendency of equity language is to blur the contours of hard, often unpleasant facts. This aversion to reality is its main appeal. Once you acquire the vocabulary, it’s actually easier to say people with limited financial resources than the poor.

  • Copernican@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    So if a criminal justice department adopts the style guide and language but keeps the exact same practices, that makes a difference for reform somehow?

    • Zaktor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I framed that imprecisely. The people developing/advocating for the style guides are trying to promote criminal justice. Malignant entities can adopt them as a misdirection, but they’re not part of a culture, they’re just using it as a deception. The author is complaining about the people telling them to use better language that’s a chore for them to integrate/remember, not the people adopting it to avoid accountability.