• silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The investor-activist group they quit was about to switch from ‘make corporations disclose their emissions’ to ‘make corporations cut their emissions’ which is what the problem was. Had they actually gone along with it, it wouldn’t have been cosmetic. (They didn’t, so…)

    • hydroptic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yep exactly. They were never going to go through with any of it anyhow, they just essentially signed a paper saying “yep when the time comes we’ll do it for sure! You can trust us, we’re not lizard people!” and that was their greenwashing done. Came time to actually do something and they went “no thank you, sounds expensive”

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The crazy part is that in the aggregate, they own enough of the stock market that it’s a net benefit to decarbonize