• Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      VW probably had way more cars involved though, so the cost per car was lower.

      • Desmond373@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wouldnt underestimate how many cummins engines there are, lots of trucks, tractors and other large machines use them, some of which run constantly. If anything i would say they got off lighter than VW

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        VW also has a revenue that’s almost 10x as much as Cummins. It’s a “cost of doing business” write off for both of them, but a more expensive one for Cummins comparatively

      • OhmsLawn@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And VW cratered due to consumer backlash. For Cummins, this is a marketing opportunity.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That was just one of the many cases. In total, dieselgate cost VW $38 billion. On top of that, a lot of their executives ended up in prison.

      Unfortunately, every other automaker (well, except Tesla for fairly obvious reasons) did the same thing, some worse than VW, and barely got any punishment.