• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Russia has been pretty clear regarding what their demands were, and those demands haven’t changed now. They want Ukraine to be a neutral country. The fact of the matter is that NATO could’ve negotiated with Russia in good faith, but instead it chose not to. Now you’re dismissing the whole idea of diplomacy claiming that it’s not even worth considering.

    • poVoq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Maybe, just maybe, diplomacy would have worked around 2017 when it would have been followed up with blocking weapon sales to Ukraine, but two weeks ago? You are delusional if you think that would have worked.

        • poVoq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          Do you even read what I write before you reply? I never claimed they changed.

          Two weeks ago there were all the Russian troops in place and all the western weapons (and western trained Ukrainian troops) already inside Ukraine. No amount of pledging to block Ukraine from joining NATO on behalf of the current German government would have stopped this.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            If you accept that the demands haven’t changed, then you understand that if these demands were met prior to the invasion then there wouldn’t be an invasion?

            • poVoq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              The demands include demilitarization of Ukraine. How would the German government be able to take away weapons from Ukraine that they already have?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 years ago

                Once again, my point was that the west did not engage in diplomacy with Russia and did not make any attempts to address their concerns. If you don’t understand why it’s desirable to try and resolve problems before they escalate into an open conflict, I really don’t know what else to tell you. Painting Russia as being implacable and claiming that any negotiations would be pointless is a self fulfilling prophecy.

                • poVoq@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  The German government did engage in diplomacy (a lot and several times), and also refused to export weapons to Ukraine until after the war broke out. So blaming this on the German government as the original article does is just plain wrong.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    The German government did not engage in any meaningful diplomacy. At no point did any western nations take Russia’s concerns seriously or made any attempt to address them. Blaming German government for failing to do what it could to try and avert the war is absolutely correct position to take. In fact, any of the NATO member governments could’ve done this, but Germany was certainly in the best position to do so.