• wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t think it’s that simple.

    Deer behave differently in the presence of predators. They migrate less, the reproduce more manageably. Overpopulation of deer results in overgrazing where they can effectively kill entire species of plants or desertify areas. We’ve engineered an environment without their natural predators.

    Culling and hunting them is different than if we caught and release neutered them.

    I’m not a hunter, and I’d be fine if we just introduced wild predators like wolves (I saw a study that this was actually healthy to their population).

    • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly, it’s not simple, hence the need for better, more ethical solutions. I don’t know the best solution, I’m not an expert on deer or ecosystems, but I think we can do better than killing till the problem goes away

      • charles@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        So you’re okay with their suggestion of introducing wolves to help control the deer population? (which for the record, I’m not denying is genuinely a promising strategy to help with the problem)

        But if you are, then how is that not also “unnecessary killing”? The end result is essentially the same thing, dead deer that become food for another specie.