• algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Capitalism may hold us back in some regards but really helps in others.

    The majority of people would likely be feudal peasants, working under a warmonger family that owns the sustaining land by force. No upward mobility except through bloodshed.

    • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      The majority of people would likely be are feudal peasants, working under a warmonger family that owns the sustaining land by force. No upward mobility except through bloodshed.

      FTFY

      • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No you don’t understand, this 9-to-5 job that’s slowly but surely wearing me down is just a stepping stone to my millions of $$. That’s why I keep voting for tax breaks for the rich; because I’ve just been temporarily down on my luck for 30 years. /s

      • algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, if you’re lucky, clever enough, overwork yourself, or manipulate others you can live a somewhat comfortable life. Those methods don’t require taking a life.

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Capitalism optimizes for efficiency. Sadly slavery is terribly efficient in terms of economics. Therefore capitalism needs to be capped by society at certain acceptable limits. Which is called socioeconomics and its not perfect but the best system we have. insert handwavy remark about whatever america is doing here

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        the problem with this is that we depend on the capitalist overlords to keep their pinky promise of not fucking with our rights.

        right now they are breaking it again because they can.

        i also don’t think having the majority of the money/value going to a few owners is efficient at all.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Capitalism is based on free exchange and wage labor. Unless a slave has volunteered to be a slave, using a slave is not “free exchange”.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thats still in a sense a commerce based system. The only reason that warlord fights for that land is because it has value, be it food, a cash crop, a strategic location.

      Warlords hoarded land and power in similar ways billionaires hoard money and power.

    • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Capitalism optimises for concentrating resources.

      Dividends, return on investment, profits, etc. are all inefficiencies in the production of value, and require more resources, labor, and suffering per unit of value than for example a circular economy.

      But it does concentrate wealth efficiently, which in turn gives access to enough resources to start larger ventures.