• jimbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    …because those 7 million people opted into sharing their data with everyone else.

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, they opted to share varying degrees of information with authorized users and close genetic matches, and 23andMe failed to protect them from a large scale takeover of accounts that made public the kind of information the company had promised to keep private to semi-private.

      14,000 accounts compromise by the same entity. That’s absolutely the fault of the platform, not the users.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You’re making a distinction without a difference. Nobody has any fucking clue who their “genetic match” will be nor does anyone have any fucking clue who else is using 23andMe. Sharing that information with other 23andMe users is not meaningfully different than just sharing it with the world at large.

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not the responsibility of your grandma who’s researching family history to be aware of potential data security threats. It’s the responsibility of the multimillion dollar online company with massive, valuable data troves to not offer a feature that was just a data breach waiting to happen.