• phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    8 months ago

    Doesn’t help that they immediately updated their user agreement to avoid responsibility. Nothing says give our product a chance like that.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly, even with really shitty notoreity and legal troubles, stock prices don’t reach pennies without gross mismanagement of shares and offers.

      Or have they just been unprofitable every quarter for years?

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Well someone’s not getting reborn 200M years from now in Cenozoic Park.

      Dun dun! Dun duuun! Dun-da daaa da-dun dun daaaah! flails silly human arms RAAAH!!!

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Except that leaving it somewhere is like a pseudonym. It would take a lot of effort to pinpoint to once specific person unless that person was already the sole target - then you just get a sample at their home.

        Also, breathing out DNA?

        • alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not necessary for the person to be the sole target.

          By comparing the persons DNA to 2 or 3 relatives in a database, it’s quite easy to identify whose DNA you have, or at least narrow it down to a few potentials. (E.g. the DNA is from a male that is a cousin of X by the male line and nephew of Y by the female line).

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          8 months ago

          all dna is interconnected as all humans are sourced from the same source dna. at some point, we will have enough dna in a database to be able to pinpoint almost any sample to anyone or their family closest in that dataset. it will eventually just be everyone. the set doesnt change, it will just grow as more people are added and its ‘accidentally’ released. its inevitable.

          retrieving any humans dna you really want is fairly trivial. we need only minute traces anymore, and it gets less as amplification techniques improve. they already have molecular sniffing devices in all major airports. not for dna, but you get the idea.

          ha, yes when you breathe you exhale a lot of particulate into the air, and guess what, its laden with your dna.

          personally, i could not care less. have my dna, do what you will with it. oh noooes you have all of the numbers of me… whateverwillido?!

          realistically, its only valuable in aggregate.

          the only real concern ive ever heard was corporations making decisions on peoples dna, and that can be trivially circumvented by extending discrimination laws.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, they’ve been heading south for years. I would have loved for it to be a drop in response to the data breach, but this was just a company that was run incompetently.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Which data were they negligent with? I thought it was breaches on other sites that gave reused passwords.

      • Hegar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Credential stuffing is a well understood part of the threat landscape that 23 and me negligently failed to account for, allowing hackers to access 7 million people’s info after hacking only 14 thousand users.

        • jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          …because those 7 million people opted into sharing their data with everyone else.

          • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            No, they opted to share varying degrees of information with authorized users and close genetic matches, and 23andMe failed to protect them from a large scale takeover of accounts that made public the kind of information the company had promised to keep private to semi-private.

            14,000 accounts compromise by the same entity. That’s absolutely the fault of the platform, not the users.

            • jimbo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              You’re making a distinction without a difference. Nobody has any fucking clue who their “genetic match” will be nor does anyone have any fucking clue who else is using 23andMe. Sharing that information with other 23andMe users is not meaningfully different than just sharing it with the world at large.

          • Hegar@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s not the responsibility of your grandma who’s researching family history to be aware of potential data security threats. It’s the responsibility of the multimillion dollar online company with massive, valuable data troves to not offer a feature that was just a data breach waiting to happen.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are still all kinds of things a company can do to mitigate at least some of this. New browser, new location, forced two-factor auth, etc.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Cmon, we know their target market was dumbasses. How many dumbasses do you know that use mfa, or that actually look at a login notification before hitting “yes, it’s me”?

  • Z4rK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    It will be interesting to see what the company that buys all their data will do with it.