Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    They tried to destroy a cultural icon. That’s the only topic worth talking about.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No, they didn’t. They knew it was behind the bullet proof glass and would not be harmed. They did this to draw attention to a cause. It worked.

    • Thomrade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      the Mona Lisa is behind several centimeters of glass. they have absolutely no way to date it with soup.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        You know why the glass is there? Because some lunatic tried to throw pait at it. You can’t justify the act because it’s guarded against it. It’s like saying it’s OK to to launch a missle at me because you know I have an interceptor system.

    • Grayox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lmao no they didnt, it has been behind glass for almost 2 decades, facts dont care about your feelings.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well we disagree. I think protests qua protests are interesting to talk about, same for climate protests, civil rights, the role of art, the role of art conservation, and even soup is pretty interesting.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        In the end, I think it’s no different than religious fanatics destroying part of their culture because they disagree with it. They prove nothing. They accomplish nothing.