The fellows called Ackman a “genocide apologist.”

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    What do you call when a country’s foreign minister, among other high ranking politicians, calls for the expulsion of an ethnicity from their lands, while his country is using the Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide as a TODO list?

    The Israeli government is not even keeping the part that is supposed to be quiet out of the government’s mouths let alone actually quite.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I didn’t know you get your comments removed by mods if you say “it’s not a genocide” and they label as misinformation lmfao.

      It’s just not. Nobody thinks that outside of Africa’s league of corrupted nations. I’ll agree that this is misinformation when the non Arabic countries sending Palestine foreign aid consider it genocide. When you can get Justin Trudeau to say it’s a genocide then I’ll change my mind.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well the ICJ just decided that there’s a case against Israel, so, despite your racist rant, it’s not just Africa that thinks that Israel actions might fall under the definition of genocide.

        • PatFusty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Sorry you are right I shouldn’t have said Africa’s corrupted nations. I should have said BRICS and other axis of evil nation states instead.

          But anyways, nobody gives a flying fuck about any ruling coming from the ICJ especially if the EU is not backing it.

        • PatFusty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Would you prefer Biden? Macron? Scholz? They all don’t call it a genocide. Who is calling it a genocide? The Arab league signed up to call it a genocide as a whole but does al-Sisi even call it a genocide? Does the king of Saudi call it a genocide?

          • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t have a preference. I was, and still am, just curious why Justin Trudeau?

            Now I am also why you listed all the others you listed as well?

            • PatFusty@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Idunno maybe because they are leaders of major countries involved. I listed Trudeau as a notable left leaning western leader who does not agree with this agenda.

              Why is South Africa championing a genocide ICJ case for Palestinians?

              • Zaktor
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Because they went through apartheid and are sensitive to oppressive, violent, and racist governments.