I believe as this community is essentially a parliamentary session, any vulgar or obscene commentary should be strongly discouraged. Much like the speaker of the house, moderators should consistently remind those who break the above guideline to refrain. Repeat offenders / extreme examples should be subject to a temporary ban. Thoughts?
edit: I wonder what people think is the purpose of downvotes? Do you not want to have the discussion?

  • sweetholymosiah@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would argue that the language you have just employed in your example is not appropriate for the Agora as it detracts from the purpose of the community. Take it to main street.

    • Contextual Idiot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And in my over-exaggerated examples, you’d be right, since they fail the Be Civil rule.

      But how about this one?

      This user’s intent was to be an asshole and a troll, and we should adjust the rules to disallow that type of conduct.

      • sweetholymosiah@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure what’s more subjective to judge a person’s intent or to judge their use of certain words. Anyways point well taken.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rule of law should derive from main street. Not ivory towers, noble titles, or watery tarts handing out scimitars