During his term in the White House, Donald Trump governed as a wartime president—with blue America, rather than any foreign country, as the adversary. He sought to use national authority to achieve factional ends—to impose the priorities of red America onto Democratic-leaning states and cities. The agenda Trump has laid out for a second term makes clear that those bruising and divisive efforts were only preliminary skirmishes.
Presidents always pursue policies that reflect the priorities of the voters and regions that supported them. But Trump moved in especially aggressive ways to exert control over, or punish, the jurisdictions that resisted him. His 2017 tax bill, otherwise a windfall for taxpayers in the upper brackets, capped the federal deductibility of state and local taxes, a costly shift for wealthy residents of liberal states such as New York and California. He moved, with mixed success, to deny federal law-enforcement grants to so-called sanctuary cities that didn’t fully cooperate with federal immigration agents. He attempted to strip California of the authority it has wielded since the early 1970s to set its own, more stringent pollution standards.
In Trump’s final year in office, he opened a new, more ominous front in his campaign to assert control over blue jurisdictions. As the nation faced the twin shocks of the coronavirus pandemic and the protests that followed the murder of George Floyd, Trump repeatedly dispatched federal law-enforcement agents to blue cities, usually over the opposition of Democratic mayors, governors, or both. Trump sent an array of federal personnel to Portland, Oregon, ostensibly to protect a federal courthouse amid the city’s chaotic protests; reports soon emerged of camouflage-clad federal agents without any identifying insignia forcing protesters into unmarked vans. Trump responded to the huge racial-justice protests in Washington, D.C., by dispatching National Guard troops drawn from 11 states, almost all of them led by Republican governors. Later he sent other federal law-enforcement officers to combat rising crime in Kansas City and Chicago, a city Trump described as “worse than Afghanistan.”
Trump has signaled that in a second presidential term, he would further escalate his war on blue America. He’s again promising federal legislation that would impose policies popular in red states onto the blue states that have rejected them. He has pledged to withhold federal funding from schools teaching critical race theory and “gender ideology.” He says he will initiate federal civil-rights investigations into liberal big-city prosecutors (whom he calls “Marxist local District Attorneys”) and require cities to adopt policing policies favored by conservatives, such as stop-and-frisk, as a condition for receiving federal grants.
Oh come on, it’s not like he tried to engage in mass murder by neglect during COVID or sent DOJ strike teams into blue cities to illegally fight protestors.
Oh wait, he did both of those things.
Biden literally committing direct genocide and you’re out here complainig about Trump having ignorant policies.
Removed by mod
I could be convinced that the recent surge of “third party voters” came from the same farm, at least originally. Or domestic hard-right orgs.
They’re coming at us from every corner of the Internet. They want Hitler Donny so badly.
Removed, rule 3. Keep it civil.
Ah the old “don’t criticise trump because biden this” deflection.
They both fucking suck. Just because blue biden is also shit, doesn’t deflect from red trumps extra special top notch shitness.
Biden is not literally killing people directly in Gaza.
He’s ENABLING Israel to do it, but that is neither literal nor direct. But, in fact, Israel doesn’t even need our help to do what they are doing, they would be doing it anyway.
Now, if you want to call out literally killing people in Yemen, sure, he’s doing that, but that’s also not an attempted genocide either.
Can you unpack that a little? What exactly was done by Joe Biden personally, that you are calling “direct genocide”, please?
Removed by mod
Removed under rule 3, OP doesn’t understand the definitions of “literal” or “direct”, point that out instead of personal attacks.
you clearly haven’t read the community standards for either your instance or this community