I’m looking for a wiki solution (either remotely hosted or self-hosted is fine) that takes Markdown input.

Thanks.

  • NuclearArmWrestling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m a big fan of Bookstack. The Docker images work great, also in Kubernetes. SSO is easy to set up as well, so if you’re using something like Authentik for SSO, you can integrate it pretty easily.

    By default it uses a WSYWIG editor, but you can change the default to Markdown. Also, the ability to use the built-in draw.io diagram tool is great if you are documenting anything like code paths or network setup.

    • tjhart85@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love Bookstack!

      The diagram tool can be used to markup anything. Besides the obvious, I’ve also put pictures as the background and then marked up those to diagram out some work I was doing around the house.

      I hope the dev makes his way over here, he was very active on Reddit.

    • kentucky444@eslemmy.es
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I researched using Bookstack but you can access the pictures even if you do not have an account and have the right URL, anybody can see the picture/attachment file in any browser.

      Not having well-implemented access control was a big No No for us.

    • kentucky444@eslemmy.es
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      +1 Dokuwiki. It is a little complicated than most to configure the first time, but once you have everything running, it will work without complaints. Also, the whole wiki is stored as plain text files, which is awesome for backups.

      • xohshoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        piling on for Dokuwiki. Have been running it personally and for an org (2 different wikis) for like 7 or 8 years. No problems, and it’s own syntax is pretty easy too. I’ve migrated a few times too and love that it’s just plain text files

  • naeap
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m currently hosting a wiki.js
    you can either use markdown or a visual editor

    • kentucky444@eslemmy.es
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      My only gripe with wiki.js was the use of SQL for local storage. My wiki must be future proof and locking myself in an obscure SQL database was the deal breaker. I know that you can sync with a Git repo, but it felt like an overkill.

  • whitehatbofh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You could always just use a github repo as a wiki. It would render markdown pages in your browser, and it comes with built in version control!

  • glacials@l.twos.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Obsidian is a fantastic note taking app that focuses on cross-linked notes, so is effectively a personal wiki.

    It has a paid add on that lets you publish it to a website, or you can just do it yourself since the files are all Markdown.

  • Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    wikijs comes to mind, it’s deploy-able with a single docker command:

    docker run -d \
    --name=wikijs \
    --restart=unless-stopped \
    --publish 8080:3000 \
    --env "DB_TYPE=sqlite" \
    --env "DB_FILEPATH=/wiki/db.sqlite" \
    --volume wikijs:/wiki \
    --volume wikijs:/wiki/data/content \
    ghcr.io/requarks/wiki:2
    
    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I also self-host WikiJS and am quite happy with it. FYI though if you’re setting it up I’d instead configure it to use Postgres as the database, as I recall reading that they’re planning on removing SQLite support at some point. Unfortunately though that does mean you lose a one-liner like this.

  • Dark Arc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think you should specify whether you’re looking for a wiki for personal use or shared use.

    If you’re looking for personal use, something like standard notes can be a great option.

    If you’re looking for shared use, and don’t care about encryption, wiki.js is IMO your best bet.

    There’s currently no option that does both. Skiff exists as an encrypted collaborative notes option but it doesn’t (to my knowledge) allow any kind of self hosting.