• Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the meme is accurate. The owners of beehaw are so obsessed with protecting their users from possible harassment that they are willing to put them in a prison with no communication with most of the outside world (lemmy.world has the most active users and sh.itjust.works is in top 5).

      • New_account@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll be honest: that’s a shitty way of handling this. Making 20 accounts to view content from 20 different instances that don’t want to cooperate with one another defeats the purpose of all of this. If that’s the plan, the Lemmyverse or whatever it’s called is dead on arrival.

        • minimar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s just temporary, primarily due to lemmy having very poor moderation tools. Once moderation tools improves, beehaw mods should be able to handle refederating.

        • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And they can leave beehaw on a full-time basis. Let the admins decide how they want to run their instances, and if users don’t like it, they can hop over to another. This is all a part of how decentralization is supposed to work. Of course it’s messy and inconsistent.

          There are plenty of beehaw users who agreed with defederation. After all, they had to essentially write an essay to be allowed in at all. I’m not surprised there are users who are okay with defederating. And again, the ones who aren’t are free to make accounts on instances with open door policies, like shit or world. Beehaw admins probably prefer it that way anyway.

          • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did those users agree after the fact or were they asked first? If there was a vote and that’s what their users choose then I take back what I said. My impression was that there wasn’t any vote.

        • HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem to be thinking of instances like ISPs or something.

          Instances are closer related to a house holding multiple parties in multiple rooms. People from other houses are welcome to join, but with the lack of moderation tools, if people from your house act like fools or assholes don’t be surprised when your house is collectively barred.

          The only reason people are so upset is because they have misframed what Lemmy is in their heads as some libertarian wet dream with no authority whatever. There is an authority. It is each instance admin.

            • Fosheze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That happens all the time with spam mail servers which is exactly the same problem beehaw was having. If you set up an email service that hosts spam bots and do nothing about it then the other email services will start blocking it.

              Beehaw was being spamed with dick pics and other shit that was actively malicious. They could ban those profiles but then those users just went and made new profiles on lemmy.world or one of the other instances with open signup. Right now Lemmy has limited moderation tools so the only way to perminantly “ban” those users is to defederate with the instances that keep hosting them. They plan to refederate with those instances once better tools are in place to perminantly block users like that.

            • twack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It would be more similar to you blocking gmail.com from sending you messagess because thier users keep flooding your server with spam.

              This happens every day. Unfortunately a small group of assholes ruined it for all of us until tools are available to deal with them.

              • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know what kind of features they need, but I could have helped make the tools and I’m sure many other people would be willing to help if they only asked.

            • kestrel7@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Isn’t this exactly how gmail treats a LOT of other email services? Email is a mess of spam and whitelists and is barely usable as a result, partially because there is no human moderation.

              • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You might be right about that. I hate email. I was just giving an example of providing a service that people rely on, then when a problem occurs cutting it off from the outside world instead of trying to fix it.

                • minimar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is a ridiculous comparison. E-Mail is a standard for communication. Lemmy is a social media. This is absurd. Social media needs moderation.

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a BeeHaw account and a lemmy.world account. I’m not imprisoned lol, it’s the Internet, not some.private island. Nothing’s stopping anyone from browsing or joining any of these communities

        • buddhabound@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Freedoms were not limited. Any user can still go apply for a beehaw account if they want one. Any beehaw user can open an account on any other instance they want. People can still talk, people can still be heard.

          No one is entitled to force others to listen to what they say. Beehaw’s owner pays for their server. It’s their own private instance. They can determine the rules that accounts that use or federate with their instance have to follow, and everyone has the freedom to associate with beehaw if they want.

          Finally, beehaw isn’t a government, taking an action to limit the freedoms of their citizens. In most modern, western societies, that is between governments and their people. In nearly every similar structure, those people do not have the same “rights” in regards to private businesses or private organizations.

          Don’t believe me? Go into a grocery store and start screaming obscenities at fellow customers and see how long it takes you to be forcibly removed and banned from the premises. And that won’t be your freedoms being limited, either. It will be that private business deciding that you’re not allowed to associate with them any longer.

          This is no different. The people who run beehaw can choose how to run their space. It’s their money they pay for the service with. We don’t get to tell them how to spend it. Their users and donors have a say in it, and if their users and donors don’t like how the operators respond to their expectations, then they won’t have users and donors. That’s for them to decide.

          People act like they’re entitled to an audience with beehaw users, and they simply aren’t. It’s that easy. You can’t just go into your neighbor’s house and demand they listen to what you have to say. They can, and will, boot your ass to the curb, or worse, as soon as they’re tired of listening. I’m not sure why this is so hard for some people to understand.

          • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            fucking exactly lmao

            people from other instances seem to have felt entitled to Beehaw’s communities and are acting like something was stolen from them when they’d never owned it to begin with

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They could also simply apply for an account on lemmy.world, if they wanted. I hear the bar is pretty low, and the users of beehaw were indirectly notified of this, too. And the inconvenience of having to create a second account is almost nonexistent.

    • lich_hegemon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Users are people capable of making their own choices. It they don’t like the moderation approach they can just make a new account elsewhere. You don’t get to tell them what they like.

        • HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is literally their community. They host it. They moderate it.

          “Lemmy” is not a community, it is a loose federation of instances that can choose not to federate with other instances.

          Your outrage seems based on “HOW DARE THEY BLOCK US FROM OUR COMMUNITY”, but it was never yours. You were merely allowed to use it

          • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It hurts both their users and us. The federation is now more divided for no good reason.

            If they wanted to create a private community from the start that would be perfectly fine. But they let people sign up and create big communities that everyone else now relies on and then defederated. Isn’t that a bit irresponsible?

            • kestrel7@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Isn’t it a bit irresponsible to let bigoted trolls post a lot of dick pics? Because that’s what was going on. You’re talking about [theoretical problems], but the mods of Beehaw made a (possibly flawed) call during an emerging situation to avoid a lot of [actually existing problems].

              • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you saying that the only possible actions are to allow trolls or defederate? It seems to me that there are also other, better solutions. If their decision was flawed, we should be able to criticize it.

            • HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, that is moderation.

              These big communities were formed by people who may or may not have understood what federation means. This is the inherent implication that comes with subscribing to a community that is located on a separate instance. As long as the moderation tools are insufficient to stop rampant trolling, this is the only real reaction the instances have available If they are not willing to add a whole bunch of moderators.

              Irresponsible is visiting other instances and not recognizing that what you post also reflects on your instance.

        • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see, you see Lemmy as being one big community, rather than separate communities that can interact with each other

          so you see defederating as like locking away a part of the community, rather than a community deciding to lock up for a bit

          • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The community didn’t decide this as far as I know. It was the owners who did it and informed their community after the fact. If there was some kind of vote and I missed it, let me know.

    • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      fucking lmao

      as if they can’f make an account on another instance

      y’all are just hurt because you think you’re being rejected and insulted by this, when they made it clear that it wasn’t personal or permanent

      • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        as if they can’f make an account on another instance

        So that makes it right to cut people off from the outside world without asking them first? Do you want things like this to keep happening? Or should we maybe try other solutions first? Somehow other instances didn’t have to defederate, so maybe it’s not necessary?

        • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          nobody is cut off, holy shit

          this is not as big of a deal as you’re making it

          people can make new accounts on freer instances in seconds