Sounds silly of course, and it is silly. But I thought it would be interesting to think it through. And with multiple minds.

How do you go about “turning off the internet” for a particular country? Because this is being attributed to Trump, I’m presuming that “turn off the internet” could mean a number of things.

Mess with DNS? Disable infrastructure? Buy out telecom?

Let’s say we’re committed to this task, how do we go about it? Let’s hear the crazy ideas

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’d have his man-servant turn off the wifi on his phone. As long as the little symbol is gone, that means the internet no longer exists. Object Permanence isn’t his strong suit.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    From a technical POV you can’t. The US is too well connected with many subsea cables to Europe, South America, and Asia.

    https://www.submarinecablemap.com/

    In addition because the providers and cables are owned and operated by private companies the government would have a very hard time convincing telcos to do that.

    Hell even internally you can’t with every major city having 2 or 3 places where providers can connect with Google, Amazon, Facebook, Cloudflare, Akamai. Not to mention all the private peering locations.

    From a political POV, make legislation that says registered telcos must turn off telecommunications equipment connected to non US locations or black hole non us traffic when entering the country when requested by a government.

  • kn33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably fucking with BGP somehow but I don’t really know beyond that

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    For many countries, it’d be as easy as cutting a few undersea cables. Two to three cut cables in 2008 brought down most of the Arab peninsula.

    https://www.wired.com/2008/12/mediterranean-c/

    As for the US and Europe, things are too interconnected for that to work. That said, the Internet as a whole is more centralized than you might expect from its history as a network that was supposed to be nuclear war proof.

    • forty2@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man I’m not pushing any political agenda or party. I don’t now what propaganda you’re talking about. I read an article, and posted it here for context behind the purpose of the post.

      Just thought it was a fun train of thought to chase down. I try not to take myself too seriously

    • teft@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Egypts internet infrastructure of 2011 does not equal US internet infrastructure of 2025. The US is too well connected to feasibly turn off the internet. With egypt in 2011 they only had to shut down five ISPs and that shut off the internet in their country.

    • forty2@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t that obliterate a ton of other infrastructure and do much more turn turn off the internet…basically turn any electronic device into a brick?

  • graycube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “Internet” isn’t actually a thing. You can disrupt large portions of computer interconnectivity by targeting popular service providers and the larger traffic hubs. Because there is no central junction or single vendor or provider it isn’t really something that can be completely shut off in one brush stroke. Note that television and voice calls and all money uses the same infrastructure. Selectively shutting off somethings and not others would be even harder.

    • forty2@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Devil in the details, as with all things he says…

      If we redefined what “turn off” means, and make it more like “no access to internet” the end result of turning off the internet is achieved.

      So far, forcing telcos into action might be the most applicable? They can pick and choose services to disable I assume