CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前Your thoughts?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1145arrow-down11
arrow-up1144arrow-down1imageYour thoughts?sh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前message-square25fedilink
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 年前Isn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-21 年前pretty sure theyd be worse in space
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前I’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 个月前Submarines would also outperform tanks in space. Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.
Isn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
pretty sure theyd be worse in space
I’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
deleted by creator
Submarines would also outperform tanks in space.
Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.