CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agoYour thoughts?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1145arrow-down11
arrow-up1144arrow-down1imageYour thoughts?sh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoIsn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 years agopretty sure theyd be worse in space
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoI’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agodeleted by creator
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoSubmarines would also outperform tanks in space. Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.
Isn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
pretty sure theyd be worse in space
I’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
deleted by creator
Submarines would also outperform tanks in space.
Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.