Wi-Fi 7 to get the final seal of approval early next year, new standard is up to 4.8 times faster than Wi-Fi 6::There are a lot of ‘draft’ Wi-Fi 7 devices around, but ‘Wi-Fi 7 Certified’ devices will only come to market sometime next year.

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Less RF interference, sure, but a lot more wall and physical object interference as the higher frequencies aren’t able to go through them nearly as well.

    Overall, it’s great to have more spectrum available, especially in a less crowded range. More options means more optimal solutions to be had.

    • Sibbo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just wait until we enter the gamma spectrum, then it should be quite penetrative.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They already have that, but it’s only been a limited release so far. Just a drop in the ocean.

    • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thats true. And the higher it goes the more money you have to spend to properly network. I have heard 60GHz requires you to be in the same room as the AP but gives fantastic speeds. What i eventually plan on doing is buying say a 24 port PoE switch and running 2 cables to the ceiling in each room (for redundancy) and putting an AP in every room. I know that will cost a good chunk of money, but with an AP in every room that would future proof the network for higher and higher frequencies in the future.

      • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re wanting to future proof, run conduit not just wires. For now a setup like that is overkill and probably straight up won’t work well, since roaming is a client decision and the clients make really silly choices sometimes.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I keep seeing this brought up but I can’t find information on how they work. How do you actually get new wire through a conduit? Do they not get stuck in corners? Or on the ridges of the tubes? What if you need to send wires upwards?

          • nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A pull string is typically vacuumed though the conduit and left inside for attaching to and pulling wires through.

          • AtariDump@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pull a pull string in the conduit along with the wires.

            When you pull new cable you use the existing pull string and pull a new pull string through the conduit at the same time; this was you still have a pull string.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is it. All this speed is theoretical, unless you’re willing to fork out a lot for a grid of APs with LoS.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        60GHz is more of a PTP or PTMP use case spectrum i.e. outdoor, long range, high throughput, but requires line of sight.

        I have an enterprise style network stack like you described, albeit a bit more. It allows me to be dedicate a single spectrum per SSID e.g. my IoT network is only 2.4GHz, or use multiple spectrums across multiple access points for a single SSID e.g. guest wifi uses 2.4GHz & 5GHz across several across points for roaming.

        I also live in a location where that’s required, or at least, warranted do to the coverage area and physical layout.

        So with that said, you can’t future proof yourself with an AP, as standards evolve and change - but you can somewhat protect yourself by running the right cable (Cat 6a). Regardless, if you’re just trying it get wifi in two rooms, you probably only need a single access point, but far be it for me to lecture someone on excessive home IT spending.

        • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I need more than one access point for sure. My house is made of brick and even the internal walls are extremely thick. So signals have real trouble penetrating the walls. That is why i intend to do 1 ap/room.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Without knowing your floorplan, I can’t really provide any additional insight.

            I would just add that I’m guessing your doors aren’t brick, so a ceiling mounted AP in a hallway, or another central location, would likely be able to provide good coverage through any doors within range.

            Regardless, running quality cable conduit, and doing it properly, is the single best and most impactful thing you can do.

            Good luck.

            • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am about 30FT from the router through 2 brick walls ~10 inches thick. 5GHz is to weak to be used at that range and will disconnect. I have to use 2.4 to stay connected.