• Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about both of you go the fuck home and let an actual progressive do some actual good for once?

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Barack Obama pulled off a surprise victory over the established Democratic candidates by campaigning on a message of hope and change. Of course his administration ended up only slightly more progressive than a standard Democrat’s, but the fact remains that a non-mainstream candidate can run and win on the promise of progressive reform.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think Biden has been more progressive then Obama. Yeah, Obama was a minority and he was a damn good orator and importantly he wasn’t Hillary. He represented progress. But his actual policies? Nah. There is something aspirational about having someone who isn’t another old white man, and I think Obama was a decent President, just not particularly progressive.

          • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In 20 years he’ll be viewed as the ragen of the dems for encouraging privacy to get steamrolled. He was in a position to act to protect Americans after bush and all he did was add fuel to the fire

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Biden is more protectionist, which is a damn shame, but what we need right now, sadly.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          And the established dem party learned from their mistakes. It will be much tougher to slide a progressive by again.

          • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can tell by how the DNC bent over backwards to accomodate Sanders and his campaign, even changing the plan to get rid of the Iowa Caucus as the first primary election since Sanders thought it would favor him in 2019. (Then Buttigieg won it instead)

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course his administration ended up only slightly more progressive than a standard Democrat’s

          This is why I liked Obama.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        More specifically, progressives would have to actually turn the fuck out for those progressives at the primaries.

        Bernie can tell you counting on that is counting on pigs flying.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bernie’s strategy to victory was turning out a huge number of young people and disaffected non voters. He lamented in the last months of his campaign that he wasn’t getting the numbers he needed.

          It’s so much easier to blame the corrupt DNC than to recognize we need to work on turnout and a broadened message. It should be obvious after 2016 that the virtue of a righteous message is not enough on its own to get a following.

          A platform of legal weed, free college, free healthcare, and student loan forgiveness couldn’t even achieve a 75% turnout of young voters – and I say that as someone who was mid 20s in 2020. You could hardly imagine a better platform for young people. There needs to be a much, much better ground game for progressives to win.

          • Luke@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bernie wasn’t on the ballot though, because he got fucked out of the opportunity. Of course the people who were incredibly motivated to vote for him didn’t show up when they were denied the opportunity to vote for him. That’s not a failure of Bernie’s message, that’s a failure of the establishment to embrace a message that motivates young and disaffected voters.

        • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          He sure as hell was at my (very close to national average demographics district’s) caucus in 2020. Damn near the whole room lined up for Biden nearly instantly. It was the same for Hillary in 2016, btw. These lies people like to repeat on the internet about how one progressive or another has overwhelming support and only loses out due to manipulation by the democratic party are not borne or by reality, and I think are often spread by those trying to either disenfranchise left voters, or are the voters that fell for it and are now doing the dirty work of repeating the lies.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sorry, but you give people free food, they’ll show up and cheer for any one. Hell. May not even need to bribe them with food.

            Also it’s not 2020, and I wonder how many people are okay with his support of Israel’s genocide? Or his track record on climate.

            Biden is not broadly popular, and you’re telling the same lies you’re accusing others. Biden is broadly tolerated- and as always been merely tolerated.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Or his track record on climate.

              Biden signed the most significant climate legislation in American history.

              You lose elections because your beliefs are fringe.

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        See: Al Gore vs Bush

        Also, still miffed about Bernie not being a “good candidate” for the DNC in 2016.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Gore won. He just fucked up by playing by the rules back when people thought that mattered. The brooks brother rioters knew better, and the right wing court put the fix in.

          Also, not to be a pill, but nader took a small percentage of the votes in Florida in that election as a progressive. Most of those probally would have gone to Gore, making the bullshit soft coup the GOP pulled off impossible if he wasn’t in the race.

          First past the post means vote for the lesser evil and pressure the fuck out of them to get the system changed. Thats it. The system doesn’t let anything else work.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nader didn’t just take a small percentage, he deliberately targeted swing states to sabotage Gore for stepping on the Green Party’s turf by running on climate issues.

            Literally the green party exists today because they refused to let the usual process 3rd parties swear is the actual reason they exist play out, and let the major party that is closest to them adopt their policies.

            And you can see that “fuck you this is my shit!” mentality to a certain degree among modern NoVote “progressives”, it isn’t enough if Biden literally delivers on everything Bernie said he would and more, because he’s “the DNC” and he’s not Bernie so it’s obviously not good enough and you should still refuse to vote for him.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              it isn’t enough if Biden literally delivers on everything Bernie said he would and more, because he’s “the DNC” and he’s not Bernie so it’s obviously not good enough and you should still refuse to vote for him.

              i’m torn between jill stein and cornel west, but if dark brandon returns and actually accomplishes this, i will vote for him. tell your boy to get to work.

          • rayyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            nader took a small percentage of the votes in Florida in that election as a progressive. Most of those probally would have gone to Gore

            Absolutely! Steve “three-shirts” Bannon and wealthy conservatives are trying their best to dilute the Biden vote by encouraging/financing RFK, Jill Stein, West and the No Labels party

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            To add in, the court didn’t have the authority to intervene. Congress is supposed to decide elections that are tied or otherwise in doubt.

            And didn’t Gore actually win the recount after all was said and done?

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              And didn’t Gore actually win the recount after all was said and done?

              Yes but he conceded before then.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Concessions don’t have legal force. The legal force is the state secretary. Or SCOTUS giving itself power.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nope he conceded on December 13. They day after SCOTUS overruled the state supreme court and every federal court under them.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fucking Gore couldnt even win his own home state, a state that overwhelmingly vote Clinton both times. Had he been able to do that he wouldnt have needed Florida.

          And what is it with liberals always blaming the 3% that vote 3rd party, and never the 15+% of Democrats that flipped party?

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because Harris would then become the default nominee and Biden knows she can’t win. It’s either that or a punishing primary resulting in some other nominee, but who would that be? Could they beat Trump? It would be a big gamble. Biden running for a 2nd term is a gamble too, but it probably is the safer bet. His real mistake was having someone as unpopular as Harris as a VP.

      I think he would be happy to hand it off to her if he thought she could win.

      I also think that it didn’t occur to Biden that Trump would still be viable after being defeated in 2020, but of course, like many of us, he underestimated both the cowardice of most Republican leaders and the depravity of Trump’s base.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Do you think people actually want a progressive candidate?

      The term “you get the politicians you deserve” is often correct, regardless of country and culture.

      EDIT: Downvotes? I thought this place was better than Reddit… If you disagree, please highlight how the demand for progressive policies has been shown by the electorate…

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Simple reason is more people who vote Democrat disagree with you than agree with you in terms of policy.

      Your two options are “convince more people to share my views” or “complain online”